POWERED BY
September 2002
Announcement: Lorne MacLean to Join Court of Appeal Pro Bono Project
Marriage Agreements - Purpose of a Marriage Agreement
Case Alert - Barker v. Barker
Case Alert - Hilton v. Hilton
Childrens' Bill of Rights
Ask the Expert: Preparation for Proof of Parental Alienation
See Our New Headquarters at Shaw Tower!
Archive: Read Past Issues

ANNOUNCEMENT
Effective August 16, 2002, Lorne MacLean has joined a list of senior family law lawyers who have agreed to participate in the Court of Appeal pro bono project. Mr. MacLean will be providing advice to qualified appellants in the British Columbia Court of Appeal on a pro bono basis. It is important to both the public and the profession that senior counsel give back to the community.

Back to top

MARRIAGE AGREEMENTS - PURPOSE OF A MARRIAGE AGREEMENT
People entering into a new or second marriage should consider very carefully the need for a prenuptial or marriage agreement. The purpose of a prenuptial or marriage agreement is to establish a clear and agreed upon frame work for resolution of issues between the parties that will arise from the marriage breakdown. Click here for the full article.

Back to top

CASE ALERT - BARKER V. BARKER (2002 BCA 345)

This appeal was from a judgment in a family law proceeding making an unequal division of the matrimonial home and postponing its sale in favour of the wife such that the wife received 70-30 reapportionment in her favour. The husband appealed from this reapportionment and in a 2-1 decision with Southin, J. speaking for the majority determined that the trial judge had erred into taking into account matters that had occurred after the triggering event in determining whether an equal division of the matrimonial home would be unfair. The Court held that the Family Relations Act contemplated an equal division of family assets unless good reason as of the triggering event requires some other division. Click here for further details and a link to the text of the decision.

Back to top

CASE ALERT - HILTON V. HILTON (2002 BCA 338)

In this case a husband appealed from the decision of the trial judge which had denied him spousal support and which had reapportioned the matrimonial home 75% in favour of his wife and all of Mrs. Hilton's RRSPs in her favour. The total value of the wife's RRSPs that she kept was $150,000 and the total value of the matrimonial home based on its sale was $465,000. Click here for further details and a link to the text of the decision.

Back to top

CHILDRENS' BILL OF RIGHTS
Please click here for the text of the Childrens' Bill of Rights adopted by the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers.

Back to top

ASK THE EXPERT: PREPARATION FOR PROOF OF PARENTAL ALIENATION (By: Deborah Day and Joy Feinberg)
Parental alienation is a hot topic at the present time in custody cases with some experts arguing it is a real syndrome and other experts saying it doesn't exist-either way please click here for an article summmarizing what to look for in troubled custody disputes.

Back to top

SEE OUR NEW HEADQUARTERS AT SHAW TOWER
Please click here to learn more about our future headquarters.

Back to top

July 2002 issue
August 2002 issue

Back to top

Sincerely,

The MacLean Family Law Group
UnsubscribePlaceHolder